This dressing of E. M. Tod's Tod-Fly Hackle uses an American woodcock covert in place of the English woodcock undercovert. |
Hook:
|
|
12-16
|
Thread:
|
|
Dark brown
|
Body:
|
|
Striped peacock quill
|
Hackle:
|
|
Woodcock covert
|
|
|
The Tod Fly is the name of a fly dressed as both a
winged wet and a soft-hackled fly by the Scottish angler E. M. Tod in his Wet-Fly Fishing Treated Methodically
(1903). Given that he provides two different dressings, it is important that
Tod observed “if I were asked to choose between the exclusive use of ‘winged’
or ‘hackled’ flies, I should then give my vote in favour of wingless
artificials (call them how you like) for the fishing of tributary
streams—that is, Waters.” They are
very often deadly, even in large rivers, and, I need hardly say, are
particularly suitable for the fishing of burns.” Tod notes that the soft-hackled dressing of
his own Tod Fly “will be found generally useful, but especially so in dull
cloudy weather.” He gives the dressing in full on Table IV:
“Body.-The striped quill from moon feather of peacock.
Hackle.-The soft, pale, mottled feather from the inside of a
woodcock’s wing.”
His winged Tod Fly uses the same body and
hackle, but adds “two strands of game-cock’s hackle” for a tail and wings
taken from a “Mavis wing, inside the feather.”
In Two
Centuries of Soft-Hackled Flies (2004), Sylvester Nemes credits E. M. Tod
with coining the term “soft-hackle” or at least being the author to first use
the term in print, and he provides a picture of Tod’s Best Fly, presumably
the Tod Fly Hackle, but his pairs an unstripped peacock herl body with what
appears to be a starling hackle. (I read the body in Tod’s dressing as a
stripped peacock quill because he describes it the same way as flies he
dresses as “Quills.”)
|
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.