The variation of the Black Spider substitutes embroidery floss for the body |
Hook:
|
12-20
|
|
Thread:
|
Black
|
|
Rib:
|
Abdomen floss
|
|
Abdomen:
|
Embroidery thread - DMC 938 dark coffee brown or,
better still, silk buttonhole twist – Coats & Clark’s 56-B dark chocolate
brown, size D
|
|
Thorax:
|
Optional; beaver and mole
|
|
Hackle:
|
Starling from the shoulder or crow
|
|
This spider pictures a mole and beaver thorax with a crow hackle. |
Or, better still:
This spider is dressed with a body of silk buttonhole twist. |
The variations above are in the vein of the Black Spider that E. M. Tod attributes to W. C. Stewart and James Baillie in Wet-Fly Fishing (1903). Tod draws no distinction between wingless, hackled flies and the dressing that Stewart describes: "When dealing with the fishing of 'Waters' with the wet fly, had I been asked to name one particular class more suitable than any other for this purpose, I should certainly have named hackled flies, the 'Spiders' of Stewart's book." He equates it with famous soft hackles like the "Water-hen Bloa,' that splendid hackled fly" and "Pritt's 'Dark Snipe and Purple'" which is "another fly of similar characteristics" to Stewart's Black Spider.
W. C. Stewart originally ranked the black spider as the "killing" pattern in his Practical Angler (1857). Stewart’s original recipe for the black spider is simple: “This is made of the small feather of the cock starling, dressed with brown silk.” His dressing, for most fly tiers, seems a bit more complicated than the typical soft hackled fly.
Stewart distinguishes the spider from the winged
wet fly, since “dressing a spider is a much simpler operation than dressing
the fly.” His dressing uses three materials: hackle, waxed silk, and silk gut
(more commonly used in Stewart’s time for building leaders than dressing
flies): “Before commencing, bite the end of the gut between your teeth; this
flattens and makes it broader at the point, which prevents it slipping; a
thing very liable to occur with small flies. Next, take the hook firmly
between the forefinger and thumb of your left hand, lay the gut along its
shank, and with a well-waxed silk thread, commencing about the centre of the
hook, whip it and the gut firmly together, till you come to the end of the
shank, where form the head by a few turns of the thread. This done, take the
feather, and laying it on with the root end towards the bend of the hook,
wrap the silk three or four times round it, and then cut off the root end.”
For Stewart, hackling the spider was crucial,
as it created both hackle and body and distinguished it from other styles of
flies depicted in the illustration above: “still holding the hook between
the forefinger and the thumb of your left hand, take the thread, lay it along
the centre of the inside of the feather, and with the forefinger and thumb of
your right hand twirl them round together till the feather is rolled round
the thread; and in this state wrap it round the hook, taking care that a
sufficient number of the fibres stick out to represent the legs; to effect
this it will sometimes be necessary to raise the fibres with a needle during
the operation.” The silk-gut-hackle
twist is wound back to the original tie-in point at the hook’s center,
tied off, and half-hitched or whip finished. Stewart characterizes this
method of fly dressing as being very
“rough and simple,” but it yields a “natural-looking, and much more durable”
fly.
|
In recent years, some fly tiers have offered
alternate methods for dressing flies. Dave Hughes adapted the common method
of dressing palmered patterns like woolly worm or woolly bugger to dress
Stewart’s spiders. Hughes method only requires tying thread and hackle, as he
illustrates in Wet Flies (1995). The
hackle is tied in like Stewart’s with the tip to the front. The feather is
wound back to the hook’s center and tied off; the thread is wound forward
through the palmer to reinforce the hackle stem, and the fly is finished at
the head.
Either version, the more traditional, front-hackled or partially-palmered versions of Stewart's spider might not follow Stewart's original intention exactly, but both offer a buggy silhouette that would undoubtedly match a hatch of caddis flies, a mayfly rising in fast water, or stonefly caught in the wash of the current.
Listing all of the authors after Stewart who
recommend his Black Spider (or any of his spiders) would be an effort too
comprehensive. The highlights, however, are interesting
enough. Stewart’s Scottish spiders are noticeably absent from T. E. Pritt’s North-Country Flies (1886), but
another Scottish author, E. M. Tod, highly recommends them in his Wet-Fly Fishing Treated Methodically
(1903). While spiders and Stewart’s method of fishing them upstream certainly
have an influence on G. E. M. Skues, Skues does not cite Stewart Spiders.
James Leisenring, however, wholeheartedly recommends them in The Art of Tying the Wet Fly and Fishing
the Flymph (1940): “I have found W. C. Stewart’s spiders to be a deadly
combination on every stream I have ever fished. If a fly fisherman presents
them carefully, he can soon acquire the reputation of a fish hog! . . . After
tying in the hackle by the stem, Stewart put the tying silk against the stem
on the inside of the hackle, twirled them together slightly, and then wound
them about the hook shank together.”
|
Neil~ These are outstanding!
ReplyDeletePhil and Lisa
Thank you both!
ReplyDeletehttp://globalflyfisher.com/patterns-tie-better/north-country-flies-on-blind-hooks
ReplyDeleteNow that is one of my favorite spiders. The ones I've used are more closely related to the last dressing. Nice job Neal!
ReplyDeleteThanks, Mark - I didn't realize some of the old posts (this was the second) are reposting, although some of them I have updated. Thanks for checking it out.
Delete